Palmer’s

Suzana Rose

Palmer’s is NOT cruelty-free.

This means that this brand tests on animals or finances animal testing. Some brands that fall under this category test on animals where required by law, which means they're not cruelty-free.

Shop

When shopping through the links below, we may earn a small commission. There’s no extra cost for you, and you’re helping support Cruelty-Free Kitty.

Details

"Palmer’s sells products to distributors around the globe including South East Asia who in turn sells to countries in Asia- including China. We do not allow any third parties to test on animals in the US."

Why We Classify Brands Like Palmer’s As “Not Cruelty-Free”

The term “cruelty-free” is unregulated. This means any brand can claim to be cruelty-free without breaking the law, even if they test on animals.

Because of this, we communicate with brands directly to gather information about their full animal testing policy.

Brands who are classified as “not cruelty-free” break one or more of the Cruelty-Free 5:

  • Their company engages in animal testing
  • Their suppliers engage in animal testing
  • They allow third-parties to test on animals on their behalf
  • They test on animals where required by law
  • They knowingly sell cosmetics in stores in mainland China, where animal testing could be performed

A supplier is any company that sells the brand raw materials, ingredients, or finished products. A third-party is an outside company or entity, whether or not it’s hired by the brand.

What’s The Deal With China?

Many beauty brands choose to sell their products in China. It’s important to note that these companies can not be considered cruelty-free.

As of 2020, China still requires most cosmetics to be tested on animals in order to be sold in the country.

As for products which can bypass these mandatory tests, the Chinese authorities may still pull these products from the shelves and have them tested on animals. Although the chance is small, we believe that companies can not be considered “cruelty-free” while taking this risk.

“Palmer’s sells products to distributors around the globe including South East Asia who in turn sells to countries in Asia- including China.

We do not allow any third parties to test on animals in the US.”

View Comments (2)
  • Yeah, it’s baffling. It seems like there’s a pattern of companies claiming “cruelty-free” and “not tested on animals”, yet at the same time these very brands are being sold in countries that mandates animal testing.

    In Palmer’s Cocoa Butter Formula’s website, the phrase “does not conduct product tests on animals” is actually taken from the phrase “We do not allow any third parties to test on animals in the US.”

    Lol, they literally just left out the “in the US” part!!! So actually, the full phrase is “does not conduct product tests on animals IN THE US.” This means that Palmer’s is still doing animal testing overseas. Smh!

  • They actually say on their website that they are cruelty-free and specifically that they do not test on animals! WTH are you on about

© 2014-2019 Cruelty-Free Kitty. Disclaimer. Privacy policy.

Scroll To Top